Scrubbing the air would be a difficult and costly process, and almost anything devised to scrub the air would produce greenhouse gasses along the way, so that the NET effect is likely to be small. Plants are still the best scrubbers around, yet there are some worrying signs. Recent research in the Australian forests in NSW, VIC and ACT shows that the ability of trees to fix carbon is reduced in periods of drought, yet the drought here in Australia has increased under effects of current climate change.
And that's not even taking into account the destruction of forests around the world!
There is worry, too, about so-called "carbon sequestration" (a process by which carbon dioxide would be removed from power plant emissions and buried underground (or in oceans). The problem is carbon leaching, with the result that the underground carbon repositories are not so effective.
So, at present, the best way to help is to cut down on carbon emissions, seek alternative transport, urge political action, and promote development of alternative energy sources.
You can tell the problem is bad when Professor James Lovelock (a noted naturalist and author of The Gaia Hypothesis and Gaia 2) embraces NUCLEAR energy as the solution. Many scientists think things are not quite as bad as Lovelock envisages, but they're worried that there isn't much time left to do something.